Western Wake Partners
Policy Advisory Committee
Recommendations
Tuesday,
March 28, 2006
Cary
Town Hall, Administration Conference Room #22010
316
N. Academy Street, Cary, North Carolina
Cary
Mayor Ernie McAlister called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Committee members attending were Apex Mayor
Keith Weatherly, Holly Springs Mayor Dick Sears, Morrisville Mayor Jan
Faulkner, Apex Town Manager Bruce Radford, Cary Town Manager Bill Coleman, and
Morrisville Town Manager John Whitson. Committee
members absent were Holly Springs Town Manager Carl Dean. The meeting adjourned at 4:27 p.m.
1.
Approval of minutes of the
Policy Advisory Committee held on December 13, 2005.
Mayor Weatherly moved to
approve the minutes, Mayor Sears provided the second and the committee
unanimously approved the motion.
2.
Items for Discussion
a.
Contract
Award – Engineering Services for
the Western Wake Regional Water Reclamation Facility Effluent Pump Station and
Outfall Pipeline (PAC06-08)
Mayor Weatherly moved to approve an engineering services contract be awarded to Hazen and
Sawyer with a value of $1,358,400
for design-phase services, with an option for staff to authorize the
construction phase services at a later date with a value of up to $848,120 as a
contract amendment, with a total authorized award amount of up to $2,206,520. Mayor Sears provided the second, and the
committee unanimously approved the motion.
(Attachment A)
b.
Provide
for Using SRF Loan for Design of Any Component of Wastewater Management
Facilities (PAC06-09)
Mayor Faulkner moved to approve the development of an
amendment to the Agreement For Design,
Construction, Ownership, Management And Operation Of Western Wake Regional
Wastewater Management Facilities to modify the terms of use for the SRF
Loan. After development, the amendment will
be submitted to the elected governing board of each Partner for approval. Mayor Weatherly provided the second, and the
committee unanimously approved the motion.
(Attachment B)
c.
Proposed Budget for Western
Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facilities (PAC06-10)
Mayor McAlister moved to approve the budget
presented for the period through FY07 for the Western Wake Regional Wastewater
Facilities. Mayor Sears provided the
second, and the committee unanimously approved the motion. (Attachment C)
3.
Other Business: N/A
4.
Closed Session
Mayor Weatherly moved for closed session
for the following purpose; Mayor Sears provided the second; and committee
granted unanimous approval.
Closed
session was called pursuant to G.S. 143-318.11(a)(3) to consult with attorneys
employed by and/or retained by the Town in order to preserve the
attorney-client privilege between the attorneys and the Town. The Committee expects to receive information
concerning the New Hill Community Association ET AL v. Town of Apex ET AL.
5.
Next Meeting: June 27, 2006, 4:00 p.m. at Cary Town Hall
Attachment A
Western Wake Partners
Report to the Policy
Advisory Committee (PAC06-08)
Date: March 28, 2006
To: Policy Advisory Committee
From: Kim Fisher, P.E. – Town of
Cary, Director of Public Works and Utilities
Prepared by: Steve
Brown, P.E., Associate Director of
Engineering,
Town of Cary
Subject: Contract
Award – Engineering
Services for the Western Wake Regional Water Reclamation Facility Effluent Pump
Station and Outfall Pipeline
|
Background: |
Staff received proposals on February 10, 2006 for engineering
services related to the design and construction of the Western
Wake Regional Water Reclamation Facility Effluent Pump Station and Outfall
Pipeline. This project will provide
facilities to convey treated wastewater from the new treatment
facility to discharge in the Cape Fear River. Proposals were received from four engineering consultants: the team of Black & Veatch and URS, CDM,
Hazen & Sawyer, and the team of Stearns & Wheler and Kimley Horn.
A
ten-member selection committee of senior staff from Apex, Cary, Holly Springs
and Morrisville was assembled to review these proposals. The selection committee reviewed each
proposal for relevant experience of the firm and its personnel and
sub-consultants, project approach and proposed schedule and cost. The work consists of two main
components: design phase
services, and construction phase services. Construction phase services are further broken down into office
construction administration services and field inspection
services. Key data from the proposals
is summarized in the following table:
|
Consultant |
Design Labor-Hours |
Design Cost |
Construction Labor-Hours |
Construction Cost |
Total Cost |
|
Black & Veatch/URS |
13,948 |
$2,030,900 |
10,491 |
$1,119,700 |
$3,150,600 |
|
CDM |
13,109 |
$2,002,000 |
14,790 |
$1,588,900 |
$3,590,900 |
|
Hazen and Sawyer |
10,980 |
$1,358,400 |
10,000 |
$848,120 |
$2,206,520 |
|
Stearns & Wheler/ Kimley Horn |
16,435 |
$2,378,000 |
8,635 |
$1,043,600 |
$3,421,600 |
The
committee recommends that an engineering services contract be awarded to Hazen
and Sawyer. The selection committee
found overall that their proposal most satisfied the needs of this
project. All of the submitted proposals
were well prepared and presented valid project approaches and teams that are
qualified to work on this project. The
selection committee however reached consensus in its deliberations that Hazen
and Sawyer’s proposal provides the best overall value for the Partners. Hazen and Sawyer’s labor-hour estimate and
cost proposal were well below those provided by the other proposing firms. They have confirmed, however, that they
carefully considered the effort required to successfully complete this project
and consider their proposal to be adequate to the task. The selection committee concurs that their
proposal adequately addresses the needs of the project. They have pledged to work closely with the
treatment facility designers to provide the Partners with a seamless
project.
Hazen
and Sawyer’s proposal successfully addresses the important project issues. It presents a well-considered plan to
evaluate pipeline sizing and alignment alternatives that could significantly
reduce pumping energy requirements, the size of electrical components, and real
estate impacts. They presented a
thorough plan to address important design considerations for the outfall and
river discharge. While Hazen and Sawyer
was teamed with CDM in development of the regulatory documents and permitting
for the Western Wake Regional facilities, they have only been peripherally
involved in the effluent pump station and pipeline elements of the project,
being much more involved in the raw wastewater conveyance side. Through this work they have become
well-informed on design considerations, utility coordination and property
issues throughout the project area.
Staff
proposes that the engineering services contract be structured in such a manner
that pre-determined lump sum amounts be paid for design phase and office-based
construction administration services while payment for field inspection
services be made based on actual cost with a not-to-exceed ceiling. It is typically in the best interest of both
parties to structure compensation in this manner. This is because the amount of effort associated with observing
and inspecting construction in the field can vary a great deal depending on
contractors, weather, site conditions, material availability, quality of
workmanship, and other variables that are difficult to fully quantify at this
time. Office-based services are easier
to quantify. Staff recommends awarding
this contract for design services only at this time, and reserving the right to
defer a decision on whether to award construction phase services (office and
field) until the design firm has proven itself on this project. The contract will require a separate
staff-level authorization for construction phase services.
The Town of Cary has exempted this project from the
provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-64.31 as it is in the best
interests of its citizens to procure these services through a process of open
competition. Therefore, cost proposals
were considered in making the final selection.
Requested Action: It is requested that the Policy Advisory Committee approve that an engineering services contract be awarded to Hazen
and Sawyer with a value of $1,358,400
for design-phase services, with an option for staff to authorize the construction
phase services at a later date with a value of up to $848,120 as a contract
amendment, with a total authorized award amount of up to $2,206,520. This award represents
a preliminary determination as to the qualifications of this consulting firm
and no legally binding acceptance of this award occurs until the Lead Agency,
Town of Cary, has executed a written agreement.
Attachment B
Western Wake Partners
Report to the Policy
Advisory Committee (PAC06-09)
Date: March 16, 2005
To: Policy Advisory Committee
From: Kim Fisher, P.E. – Town of
Cary, Director of Public Works and Utilities
Prepared By: Leila
Goodwin, P.E. – Town of Cary, Water Resources Manager
Subject: Consideration of Using SRF Loan For Design of Effluent and Raw Wastewater Conveyance
Facilities, in Addition to Water Reclamation Facility.
|
Background: |
Section
2.2 (e) of the Agreement For Design,
Construction, Ownership, Management And Operation Of Western Wake Regional
Wastewater Management Facilities dated August 22, 2005 (“Agreement”),
defines the SRF Loan as:
“…the
$5,000,000 loan incurred by the Lead Agency from the State of North Carolina in
order to finance certain of the costs of the Preliminary Work and the cost of
design of the Water Reclamation Facility.”
The
terms of the SRF Loan specify that the Lead Agency (Cary) will be reimbursed
for eligible expenses incurred prior to January 1, 2007. Eligible expenses include those expenses
related to planning, permitting, and design of any of the Western Wake Regional
Wastewater Facilities (not just the Water Reclamation Facility). Repayment of the SRF Loan begins November 1,
2007.
|
Discussion: |
While
the terms of the SRF Loan allow use of loan funds for design of any component
of the Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facilities (“Wastewater
Management Facilities”), the Project Partners specified use of the design
portion of the SRF Loan Funds solely for the Water Reclamation Facility in an
attempt to simplify the accounting associated with the SRF Loan.
During
preparation of the budget for the Wastewater Management Facilities, it became
apparent that the costs incurred prior to January 1, 2007 for the Preliminary
Work (EIS/permitting) and for design of the Water Reclamation Facility are
expected to be less than $5,000,000.
Staff from the Construction Grants and Loans Section of the NCDENR
Division of Water Quality, which administers the SRF Loan, indicated that the
end reimbursement date of the SRF Loan cannot be modified.
Approximately
$1.4 million has been spent to date on items eligible for reimbursement, on
Preliminary Work and the Water Reclamation Facility design.
The
Lead Agency proposes applying SRF Loan funds to the following projects, in
order of priority:
Preliminary
Work
Water
Reclamation Facility Design (including selection of Electrical Power Provider)
Effluent
Pump Station and Pipeline Design
Beaver
Creek Pump Station and Force Main Design
In
order for SRF Loan funds to be used for items related to design of the Effluent
Pump Station and Pipeline and the Beaver Creek Pump Station and Force Main, an
amendment to the Agreement is needed.
Requested Action: It is requested that the Policy Advisory Committee approve development
of an amendment to the Agreement For
Design, Construction, Ownership, Management And Operation Of Western Wake
Regional Wastewater Management Facilities to modify the terms of use for
the SRF Loan. After development, the
amendment will be submitted to the elected governing board of each Partner for
approval.
Attachment C
Western Wake Partners
Report to the Policy
Advisory Committee (PAC06-10)
Date: March 16, 2005
To: Policy Advisory Committee
From: Kim Fisher, P.E. – Town of
Cary, Director of Public Works and Utilities
Prepared By: Leila
Goodwin, P.E. – Town of Cary, Water Resources Manager
Subject: Consideration of Budget Through FY07 for
Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facilities
|
Background: |
Section
3.3 of the “Agreement For Design, Construction, Ownership, Management And
Operation Of Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facilities” dated
August 22, 2005, specifies that:
“The
Lead Agency shall prepare the Annual Budget for each Fiscal Year and as
expeditiously as possible shall provide each of the Project Partners with the
Annual Budget. The Lead Agency shall endeavor to prepare and provide to each
Project Partner by each March 15 a preliminary Annual Budget for the ensuing
Fiscal Year. To the extent possible,
the Lead Agency shall prepare the Annual Budget so that it will be possible to
determine from such budget the Current Expenses for the Wastewater Management
Facilities that will be allocable to each Project Partner during the Fiscal
Year.”
|
Discussion: |
Table
1 shows the estimated budget through Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) for the Western
Wake Wastewater Management Facilities, along with expenditures to date. Planned expenditures through FY07 are mostly
for land purchase and design. Key
items are:
Table
2 shows the Partners’ pro-rata cost shares for each project, and Table 3 shows
the estimated expenditures for each Partner through FY07. For estimation purposes, it was assumed that
SRF Loan funds are spent as follows (pending Policy Advisory and governing
board action on PAC06-09):
$2
million on WRF design
$1
million on Effluent Pump Station and Outfall design
$300,000
on Beaver Creek Pump Station and Force Main design
That
is why the total costs to the Project Partners through FY07 are $3.3 million
less that the planned expenditures shown in Table 1.
Requested Action: It is requested that the Policy Advisory Committee accept the
budget presented for the period through FY07 for the Western Wake Regional
Wastewater Facilities.
|
Table 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Western Wake Regional
Wastewater Management Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Budgets Through Fiscal
Year 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Budgeted Amounts From Interlocal Agreements |
Proposed Capital Budget Through FY07 |
Spent Through 3/2/06 |
|||||||||
|
Capital Budget |
||||||||||||
|
Facility |
Capital |
Land |
Total |
Total |
Capital |
Land |
Total |
|||||
|
West Cary PS |
$ 12,597,000 |
$ 400,000 |
$ 12,997,000 |
$5,343,000(2) |
$2,893,081(2) |
$351,645 |
$3,244,726 |
|||||
|
West Cary Force Main |
$ 8,589,000 |
$ 99,000 |
$ 8,688,000 |
$0 (2,3) |
$ - |
$ - |
$0 |
|||||
|
West Reedy Branch Gravity
Sewer |
$ 7,429,000 |
$ - |
$ 7,429,000 |
$0 (2,3) |
$ - |
$ - |
$0 |
|||||
|
Beaver Creek PS |
$ 20,774,000 |
$ 580,000 |
$ 21,354,000 |
$2,189,000 (2) |
$ - |
$ - |
$0 |
|||||
|
Beaver Creek Force Main |
$ 9,642,000 |
$ 124,000 |
$ 9,766,000 |
$2,189,000 (2) |
$ - |
$ - |
$0 |
|||||
|
Western Wake WRF |
$ 113,698,000 |
$ 7,585,000 |
$ 121,283,000 |
$16,160,000 (1) |
$ 243,173 (1) |
$3,073,619 |
$3,316,792 |
|||||
|
Effluent Pump Station |
$ 10,062,000 |
$ 1,235,000 |
$ 11,297,000 |
$2,841,000 (2) |
$ 238 (2) |
$500,357 |
$500,595 |
|||||
|
Effluent Pipeline and
Outfall |
$ 37,378,000 |
$ 1,323,000 |
$ 38,701,000 |
$7,713,000 (2) |
$ - |
$ - |
$0 |
|||||
|
Total Capital Budget |
$ 220,169,000 |
$ 11,346,000 |
$ 231,515,000 |
$36,435,000 |
$ 3,136,492 |
$ 3,925,621 |
$ 7,062,113 |
|||||
|
Operating Budget |
||||||||||||
|
Project Management (Fixed
Current Expenses) |
NA |
$130,000 |
|
|
$0 |
|||||||
|
Grand
Total |
|
|
|
$36,565,000 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
(1) Costs for design eligible for reimbursement under SRF Loan (2) Costs for design eligible for reimbursement under SRF Loan, submittal pending approval by Policy Advisory Committee (3) Some preliminary design may be done in FY07 as part of Beaver Creek PS design |
||||||||||||
|
Table 2 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Cost Share Allocations
for Western Wake Regional Wastewater Management Facilities |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Facility |
Apex |
Cary |
Holly
Springs |
Morrisville |
|||
|
West
Cary PS |
0% |
87.8% |
0% |
12.2% |
|||
|
West
Cary PS Land |
0% |
87.5% |
0% |
12.5% |
|||
|
West
Cary Force Main |
0% |
87.8% |
0% |
12.2% |
|||
|
West
Cary Force Main Land |
0% |
87.5% |
0% |
12.5% |
|||
|
West
Reedy Branch Gravity Sewer |
10.6% |
78.2% |
0% |
11.2% |
|||
|
West
Reedy Branch Gravity Sewer Land |
10.6% |
78.2% |
0% |
11.2% |
|||
|
Beaver
Creek PS |
22.0% |
68.6% |
0% |
9.4% |
|||
|
Beaver
Creek PS Land |
34.7% |
57.2% |
0% |
8.1% |
|||
|
Beaver
Creek Force Main |
26.2% |
64.9% |
0% |
8.9% |
|||
|
Beaver
Creek Force Main Land |
34.7% |
57.2% |
0% |
8.1% |
|||
|
Western
Wake WRF |
34.1% |
57.7% |
0% |
8.2% |
|||
|
Western
Wake WRF Land |
34.7% |
57.2% |
0% |
8.1% |
|||
|
Effluent
Pump Station |
25.6% |
43.4% |
24.8% |
6.2% |
|||
|
Effluent
Pump Station Land |
26.9% |
44.3% |
22.5% |
6.3% |
|||
|
Effluent
Pipeline and Outfall |
25.6% |
43.4% |
24.8% |
6.2% |
|||
|
Effluent
Pipeline and Outfall Land |
26.9% |
44.3% |
22.5% |
6.3% |
|||
|
Project
Management |
26.7% |
59.6% |
5.3% |
8.4% |
|||
|
Table 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Western Wake Regional
Wastewater Management Facilities |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Project Partner Budgets
Through Fiscal Year 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Invoiced Through 3/2/06 |
Remaining Proposed Budget Through FY07 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Capital Budget |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Facility |
Apex |
Cary |
Holly Springs |
Morrisville |
Apex |
Cary |
Holly Springs |
Morrisville |
|||||||||
|
West Cary PS |
$0 |
$1,302,586 |
$0 |
$182,082 |
$0 |
$3,387,368 |
$0 |
$470,964 |
|||||||||
|
West Cary Force Main |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|||||||||
|
West Reedy Branch Gravity
Sewer |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|||||||||
|
Beaver Creek PS |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$555,240 |
$1,435,534 |
$0 |
$198,226 |
|||||||||
|
Beaver Creek Force Main |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$584,058 |
$1,411,113 |
$0 |
$193,829 |
|||||||||
|
Western Wake WRF (1) |
$1,030,177 |
$1,698,160 |
$0 |
$240,474 |
$3,839,663 |
$6,437,760 |
$0 |
$913,766 |
|||||||||
|
Effluent Pump Station (2) |
$130,006 |
$214,100 |
$108,741 |
$30,448 |
$535,050 |
$898,774 |
$495,667 |
$128,214 |
|||||||||
|
Effluent Pipeline and
Outfall (3) |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$1,735,727 |
$2,925,349 |
$1,634,395 |
$417,529 |
|||||||||
|
Total Capital Budget |
$1,160,183 |
$3,214,846 |
$108,741 |
$453,003 |
$7,249,738 |
$16,495,898 |
$2,130,062 |
$2,322,529 |
|||||||||
|
Operating Budget |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Project Management (Fixed
Current Expenses) |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$34,710 |
$77,480 |
$6,890 |
$10,920 |
|||||||||
|
Totals for Each Project
Partner |
$1,160,183 |
$3,214,846 |
$108,741 |
$453,003 |
$7,284,448 |
$16,573,378 |
$2,136,952 |
$2,333,449 |
|||||||||
|
Grand Total (1,2,3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$33,265,000 |
|||||||||
|
(1)
Assume
$2M SRF Loan used for design (2)
Assume
$300,000 SRF Loan used for design (3)
Assume
$1M SRF Loan used for design |
|||||||||||||||||