Western
Wake Partners
Policy Advisory Committee
Recommendations
Cary
Mayor Ernie McAlister called the meeting to order at
A. Approval of minutes of the Policy Advisory Committee held on
April 24, 2007.
Mayor Sears moved to
approve the minutes, Mayor Faulkner provided the second and the committee
unanimously approved the motion.
B. Items for Discussion:
1. Beaver Creek Pump Station Site Selection and
Tunneling Costs
(PAC07-14)
Mayor Weatherly moved to approve the authorization
for the Lead Agency to develop an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement, to be
approved and executed by each Partner governing body, to include the Beaver
Creek sewer tunnel as part of the Western Wake Wastewater Management
Facilities. Mayor Sears provided the
second, and the committee unanimously approved the motion.
2. West Reedy Branch Gravity Sewer – Preferred
Alignment (PAC07-15)
This report was provided for information only. No action required.
3. Beaver Creek Force
Mayor Weatherly moved to approve the authorization
for the Lead Agency to develop an amendment to the Interlocal Agreement, to be
approved and executed by each Partner governing body, to provide Apex the same
hydraulic capacity in the BCFM as currently proposed for the Beaver Creek Pump
Station and revise the cost share distributions accordingly. Mayor Sears provided the second, and the
committee unanimously approved the motion.
4. Selection of Brown and Caldwell for Engineering
Services Related to Permitting Assistance (PAC07-17)
Mayor Weatherly moved to approve the authorization
for the Town of
C. Other Business
D. Closed Session N/A
E. Next Meeting: August 28,
Western Wake Partners
Report to the Policy
Advisory Committee (PAC07-14)
Date:
To: Western
Wake Partners
From: Steve
Brown, P.E., – Associate Director of Engineering, Town of Cary
Tim
Donnelly – Public Works & Utilities Director, Town of
Prepared by: Jamie Revels, P.E., - Senior Engineer, Town
of
Subject: Beaver Creek Pump Station Site
Selection and Tunneling Costs.
Background:
The engineering firm Hazen and Sawyer has been
investigating potential sites for the Beaver Creek Pump Station. The purpose of the Beaver Creek Pump Station
is to receive raw wastewater collected from western
Figure A-1:
Target Area for Beaver Creek Pump Station

Goals of Site
Selection:
One of the primary goals of the Beaver Creek Pump
Station project is to construct one regional pump station to serve both the
Reedy Branch and Beaver Creek service basins.
The land area shown in Figure A-1 represents the natural confluence of
Reedy Branch and Beaver Creek. The
benefits of siting one central pump station to serve
both basins, as opposed to constructing separate pump stations for each service
area, are reduced environmental impacts, lower cost, reduced community impacts
and lower life cycle operation and maintenance costs.
A second goal of the site selection process is to
design for the maximum utilization of gravity sewer trunk lines into the
regional pump station. The construction
of gravity sewer trunk mains into the pump station will minimize if not completely
eliminate the need for constructing separate local pump stations and force
mains in the immediate extended area surrounding the Beaver Creek Pump
Station. As a result of effectively
locating the Beaver Creek Pump Station to take advantage of gravity influent
flow, the entire service area will benefit from the potential availability of
gravity sewer service for residential and commercial purposes.
A third goal of the site selection process is to
design for single-stage pumping requirements.
A major concern in locating the pump station is gauging the pumping
capacity required to lift the wastewater flow from the pump station wet well to
the influent receiving structure at the proposed water reclamation
facility. As a general rule, the maximum
acceptable design point would limit total dynamic head to 200 feet or less so
that two-stage pumping is not required.
A primary design goal is to assure that intermediate or additional
pumping facilities are not required between the pump station and the plant
site.
All of the site alternatives within the target area
shown on Figure A-1 would meet the three goals of the site selection
process. Therefore, other criteria were
used to evaluate the alternative sites, including cost, environmental impacts
and property impacts.
Alternative
Sites:
Within the area shown on Figure A-1, three
potential pump station sites were identified for further study. A potential site located adjacent to
Site Alternative 1:
The Southeast Olive Chapel
Road Site was not specifically referenced in the earlier versions of the EIS
document, however, when the preliminary engineering investigation was
initiated, this site warranted a secondary review due to the desirable
elevation of the site and its close proximity to the proposed West Reedy Branch
Sewer Interceptor. The primary benefit
of this site is the reduction in tunneling required for the West Reedy Branch
Interceptor. During the site
investigation, several constraints were noted with the Southeast Olive Chapel
Road Site location that would adversely affect constructing a pump station on
this site. One unfavorable finding was
the discovery of a natural spring traversing the buildable
area of the site (see Figure B-1). The
design team concluded that dewatering the spring during construction could
cause significant problems, and could markedly increase construction costs.
Figure B-1: Site
Alternative 2,

An additional factor that
detracted from this site is the number of impacted property owners. This site would require the acquisition of
property from multiple property owners listed as Wake County and Frances H. Lawrence,
plus the relocation of a third property owner who currently resides on a
co-owned portion of the Wake County property and has a lifetime estate. In terms of community impacts, this site was
determined to be the most visible of all the potential site alternatives. Upon consideration of the unfavorable factors
associated with this site, it was removed from further consideration.
Site Alternative 2:
The Southwest Olive Chapel
Road Site is located adjacent to the Southeast Olive Chapel Road Site. However, it is located further south and away
from the natural spring traversing the Southeast Olive Chapel Road Site. The Southwest Olive Chapel Road Site would
minimize impacts to property owners since the the
pump station would be located in an open field area adjacent to the American
Tobacco Trail. It is assumed that visibility
of the trail for this site would be mitigated by landscaped buffers.
Figure B-2: Site
Alternate 2,

The Southwest Olive Chapel
Road Site was not specifically referenced in earlier versions of the EIS,
although the location is still within the general area submitted for
consideration. Similar to the Southeast
Olive Chapel Road Site, this site impacts both the
Site Alternative 3:
The remaining site location
under consideration is north of
Figure B-3: Site
Alternative 3,

The North Olive Chapel Road
Site was not previously listed in the earlier versions of the EIS as a potential
site; however, this location is within the general area outlined in the EIS
documents. The pump station footprint
for the North Olive Chapel Site does impact approximately 0.34 acres of
wetlands. These wetland impacts may
potentially be mitigated onsite. The
design team has determined that the buildable area on
the site is sufficient to construct the pump station, although further
investigations are underway to develop a more detailed site layout plan.
From the perspective of
community impacts, this site provides the least disturbance to the surrounding
community since it will be located on a currently undeveloped tract of
land. All of the other sites have
community impact issues such as the lifetime estate and conservation easement
noted earlier. In summary, the North
Olive Chapel Road Site provides the best opportunity to minimize community
impacts and minimizes cost impacts by constructing the pump station at the
shallowest possible depth of the potential site alternatives under review.
Site Recommendation:
After identifying the target area for the pump
station and then the potential sites, the site recommended by the design team
is the
Apex Service
Area and Tunneling Costs:
As an additional consideration in the selection of
the Beaver Creek Pump Station site, tunneling will be required for Apex to
serve the Beaver Creek basin. The depth
of the pump station will be designed to accommodate both the West Reedy Branch
Interceptor from
In order to make the
As a further measure of equity among the Western
Wake Partners, design plans will be drafted and permitted to extend the Beaver
Creek gravity sewer trunk line from the end of the proposed tunnel to the east
side of Richardson Road. Design plans,
construction documents, permitting and easement acquisitions for the proposed
Apex Beaver Creek Gravity Sewer will be provided by the Western Wake
Partners. The proposed design services
benefit the project by making provisions to cross the entire Michael Lawrence
property in one construction phase project and by making provisions for the
proposed Apex Beaver Creek gravity sewer trunk line to cross under the proposed
Beaver Creek Force Main, which will be extended alongside of
Figure C-1, Proposed
Beaver Creek Gravity Sewer

The current projected construction cost of the
Beaver Creek Trunk Sewer including the tunnel is $4,675,500 which consists of
approximately 1,935 linear feet of 42-inch trunk sewer installation of which
1,300 linear feet would be installed by a tunneling procedure. The current proposal to distribute the cost
of the tunnel on a equal basis between
Cary/Morrisville and Apex has been discussed in concept as listed below.
Cost Distribution of Beaver Creek Trunk Sewer and
Tunnel
Cary/Morrisville: 50%
share, $2,337,750
Apex: 50% share, $2,337,750
Total $4,675,500
The additional construction costs of the Apex
Beaver Creek Gravity Sewer extending from the end of the proposed tunnel to the
east side of Richardson Road will be borne solely by Apex, although
construction contracts will be merged with the tunneling work conducted by the
Western Wake Partners and all construction work will be administered by the
Project Partners.
Estimated
Project Costs:
The location of the Beaver Creek Pump Station not only
impacts the construction cost of the pump station itself, but also the cost of
the ancillary pipelines and supporting infrastructure. Table 1 provides estimated total costs for
all of the major conveyance facilities, including the West Reedy Branch Interceptor,
Beaver Creek Pump Station, Beaver Creek Sewer Tunnel and the Beaver Creek Force
Main affected by the selection of the pump station site. Not shown are cost projections for the SE
Olive Chapel and SW Olive Chapel sites, which are approximately the same as for
the North Olive Chapel Road site, although less desirable sites for reasons
other than cost.
Table 1: Costs of Beaver Creek Pump Station and Conveyance
Facilities
|
Projects Affected by Location of
Beaver Creek Pump Station |
N. Olive Chapel Road Site for
Beaver Creek PS |
|
West Reedy
Branch Interceptor, 54-inch, 50.4-MGD 2030 Peak Capacity |
$8,488,500.00 |
|
Beaver
Creek Pump Station, 57.53-MGD, 2030 Peak Capacity |
$16,656,000.00 |
|
Beaver
Creek Force Main, 42-inch, 2020 Peak Capacity of 39.41-MGD |
$13,119,000.00 |
|
Apex
Tunnel Cost, 1,935-lf of 42-inch DIP installation and 1,300-lf tunnel |
$4,675,500.00 |
|
Project
Total |
$42,939,000.00 |
|
|
$29,059,924.35 |
|
Morrisville
Cost, (WRBI at 11.2% and BCPS, BCFM at 9.6% and Apex Tunnel at 6.03%) |
$4,091,044.65 |
|
Apex Cost,
(WRBI at 10.6% and BCPS, BCFM at 22% and Apex Tunnel at 50%) |
$9,788,031.00 |
|
Project
Total |
$42,939,000.00 |
Requested
Action: It is recommended that the Policy Advisory
Committee authorize the Lead Agency to develop an amendment to the Interlocal
Agreement, to be approved and executed by each Partner governing body, to
include the Beaver Creek sewer tunnel as part of the Western Wake Wastewater
Management Facilities to modify the cost allocations and conditions outlined
herein, including all design phase services, permitting and easement
acquisitions for the Apex Beaver Creek sewer extension to the east side of
Richardson Road as part of the tunneling contract. It is also recommended that the Project
Partners administer the construction contracting effort for the Apex Beaver
Creek Sewer from the Beaver Creek Pump Station to the east side of Richardson
Road as one construction contract, including the portion of the project from the
end of the tunnel to Richardson Road in which the construction phase costs will
be borne solely by Apex.
It is further requested that, in accordance with
the Interlocal Agreement, Apex and Morrisville provide written concurrence to
the Lead Agency with the selection of the
Western Wake Partners
Report to the Policy
Advisory Committee (PAC07-15)
Date:
To: Western
Wake Partners
From: Steve
Brown, P.E., – Associate Director of Engineering, Town of Cary
Prepared by: Jamie Revels, P.E., - Senior Engineer, Town
of
Subject: West Reedy Branch Gravity Sewer –
Preferred Alignment.
Background:
The engineering firm Hazen and Sawyer has been
investigating route and alignment options for the West Reedy Branch Interceptor
(WRBI). The WRBI is one portion of the
pipeline infrastructure required to convey raw wastewater from the West Cary
Pump Station to the proposed Beaver Creek Pump Station. Initial plans called for pressurized sewer
pipelines to convey raw wastewater from the West Cary Pump Station to the
Beaver Creek Pump Station. However, it
was later determined that topography was favorable to utilize a gravity sewer
pipeline for the last 2 miles extending from Jenks Road to the Beaver Creek
Pump Station. The advantages of
utilizing gravity sewer as opposed to pressurized sewer force mains for this
segment of pipeline are reduced pumping costs, improved accessibility for
maintenance operations, and the ability to connect surrounding property to
gravity sewer service. The WRBI is
located entirely in the Apex urban services area and benefits Apex by providing
gravity sewer accessibility to support future growth and development.
During project planning, the Project Partners
elected to size the WRBI to provide for 2030 capacity. The incremental cost of upsizing the sewer
pipeline to provide 2030 capacity in the Phase 1 project was minor in
comparison to the cost of constructing a separate gravity sewer pipeline in
Phase 2. This is due in part to gravity
sewer lines requiring manholes to be constructed at all grade and direction
changes to maintain gravity sewer operation.
The manholes require a significant percentage of the overall
construction budget and the benefit of constructing one larger pipeline with
the current project is that only one set of manholes will be constructed, as
opposed to constructing a future pipeline with a second set of access manholes
in the future. A second noteworthy
advantage of constructing a single gravity sewer pipeline is that it can be
designed to provide sufficient velocity to operate under low flow conditions
while at the same time providing sufficient residual capacity to accommodate
2030 peak flows. Finally, a third
advantage is the avoidance of two periods of construction disturbance, which
minimizes the impacts to surrounding property owners.
The goal of the route selection process was to
maintain conditions favorable for the operation of a gravity sewer pipeline from
the
The design flow capacity of the WRBI must be
sufficient to provide for flow conveyance from the West Cary Pump Station while
at the same time providing residual capacity for growth and development in the
White Oak Creek and Reedy Branch sewer basins in the Apex urban services
area. Accounting for all flow
projections, the peak design capacity for the WRBI is currently 50.62 million
gallons per day, mgd, as shown in the following table.
Table 1:
Flow Projections for the West Reedy Branch Interceptor
|
West Reedy Branch
Interceptor, Flow Contributions |
2020 Flow Projections |
2030 Flow Projections |
||
|
Max. Month, mgd |
Peak Flow, mgd |
Max. Month, mgd |
Peak Flow, mgd |
|
|
|
11.68 |
30.68 |
16.77 |
44.06 |
|
Cary/Apex Water Treatment
Plant Process Flow |
0.40 |
0.40 |
2.40 |
2.40 |
|
|
0.05 |
0.13 |
0.80 |
2.02 |
|
Apex Reedy |
0.77 |
1.94 |
0.85 |
2.14 |
|
Total |
|
33.15 |
|
50.62 |
In order to provide sufficient capacity for the
2030 peak flow, a 54-inch sewer pipeline is required. Several cost factors, including pipe
materials, coatings, manhole locations, etc. are still under evaluation by the
engineering design team. The current
projected cost of the WRBI is $8,488,500.00.
Requested Action: No action is required; the preferred alignment
for the West Reedy Branch Interceptor has been provided for review and
discussion by the Policy Advisory Committee.
Figure
1: Preferred Pipeline Routing for the
West Reedy Branch Interceptor

Western Wake Partners
Report to the Policy
Advisory Committee (PAC07-16)
Date:
To: Western
Wake Partners
From: Steve
Brown, P.E., – Associate Director of Engineering, Town of Cary
Prepared by: Jamie Revels, P.E., - Senior Engineer, Town
of
Subject: Beaver Creek Force
Background:
The engineering firm Hazen and Sawyer has been
investigating potential route and alignment options for the Beaver Creek Force
Main (BCFM). The BCFM consists of pipeline
infrastructure required to convey raw wastewater from the Beaver Creek Pump
Station to the proposed Western Wake Regional Water Reclamation Facility. Increasing elevations of approximately 80-ft
from the proposed Beaver Creek Pump Station to the proposed Western Wake Water
Reclamation Facility prevent the BCFM, which will extend a total length of
25,650-lf or approximately 5-miles, from being constructed as a gravity sewer
pipeline and therefore, require the proposed BCFM to be constructed as a pressurized
sewer pipeline. Unlike a gravity sewer
trunk line, a pressurized sewer pipeline can not be connected directly to
branch sewer mains to provide local sewer service. However, through the process of constructing
regional pump stations, force mains and the water reclamation facility, the
basic framework will be provided to facilitate the extension of local sewer
systems to serve residential and commercial purposes.
In reviewing potential route and alignment
locations for the Beaver Creek Force Main, two primary alternatives were
identified that offered the most direct approach to the proposed Western Wake
Water Reclamation Facility. The routes
were identified as the New Hill Olive Chapel route and the Progress Energy
route.
The New Hill Olive Chapel route and the Progress
Energy route both advance along the same alignment beginning at the Beaver
Creek Pump Station and extending along Richardson Road before turning to a
cross country route that follows a Progress Energy power line to Humie Olive road, see Figure 1.
New
At
Figure
1: Display Map of Alternate Routes for
Beaver Creek Force

Progress
As stated previously, both pipeline routes follow
the same alignment from the proposed Beaver Creek Pump Station to the
intersection with
Route
Comparison and Recommendation
In comparing the two alternative routes, they are
very similar in terms of overall length, environmental impacts and cost. The key differences are reflected in how
pipeline routing may affect the New Hill community. The New Hill Olive Chapel route follows a heavily
traveled roadway corridor along New Hill Olive Chapel road directly into New
Hill. This route would affect the New
Hill community, its citizens and outside commuters in a manner that would be
considered visible by the surrounding community, including traffic disruption
during construction. Conversely, the
Progress Energy route follows a cross country pattern along mostly undeveloped
property and would not disturb the New Hill/Old US 1 intersection. There are several developed properties along
one portion of the Progress Energy route, adjacent to
Design
Flow Rates
The design flow rates for the Beaver Creek Force
Main have been shown in Table 1. After a
thorough review of design criteria for the Beaver Creek Force Main, it has been
determined that no additional flow contributions will be connected beyond the
Beaver Creek Pump Station. Therefore,
the flow contributions shown in Table 1 are the
Table 1:
Beaver Creek Force Main Design Flow Rates
|
Beaver Creek Force |
2020 Flow Projections |
2030 Flow Projections |
||
|
Max. Month, mgd |
Peak Flow, mgd |
Max. Month, mgd |
Peak Flow, mgd |
|
|
|
11.68 |
30.68 |
16.77 |
44.06 |
|
Cary/Apex Water Treatment
Plant Process Flow |
0.40 |
0.40 |
2.40 |
2.40 |
|
|
0.05 |
0.13 |
0.80 |
2.02 |
|
Apex Reedy |
0.77 |
1.94 |
0.85 |
2.14 |
|
|
2.48 |
6.25 |
2.75 |
6.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
39.40 |
|
57.55 |
same as those applied to the
design of the Beaver Creek Pump Station.
The design flow capacity of the BCFM must be
sufficient to meet the needs of the Project Partners through 2020, which
translates into a peak design flow rate of 40-mgd. At a minimum, a 42-inch pipeline will be
required to accommodate the 2020 capacity of 40-mgd at a maximum allowable velocity
of 7-ft/second. Long term plans include
the construction of a second parallel force main during Phase 2 to provide the
additional capacity and redundancy to meet the 2030 needs of the system.
Apex Cost
Allocations
During preliminary engineering, it was anticipated
that additional flow contributions from the Apex Little Beaver Creek Pump
Station service area would be connected through a separate pipeline with the
proposed Beaver Creek Force Main. As a
result of this early planning, the Interlocal Agreement provided Apex increased
capacity in the Beaver Creek Force Main to accommodate the projected flow
capacity for the Little Beaver Creek sewer basin. Current planning has demonstrated that Apex
has identified other ways to serve the Little Beaver Creek sewer basin without
a connection to the proposed Beaver Creek Force Main. As a result, Apex does not require additional
capacity in the Beaver Creek Force Main beyond that already provided at the
Beaver Creek Pump Station.
Summary
After thoroughly reviewing the two pipeline routes
for the BCFM, the design team has recommended the Progress Energy route over
the
Several construction cost factors, including pipe
materials, coatings, corrosion protection etc. are still under evaluation by
the engineering design team. However,
the current projected cost of the BCFM is $13,119,000, which includes the
construction of a single, 42-inch diameter pipeline to provide 2020 capacity of
approximately 40 mgd.
At present, the Interlocal Agreement has provided
Apex with additional capacity in the BCFM that is no longer necessary. Therefore, the peak hydraulic capacity of the
BCFM can be reduced to the flow rate projections as outlined in Table 1, which
do not include the Little Beaver Creek sewer basin. Additionally, the Interlocal Agreement cost
share distribution for the BCFM can be modified to the same as currently
specified for the Beaver Creek Pump Station.
Requested Action: The
preferred alignment for the Beaver Creek Force Main has been provided for
review and discussion by the Policy Advisory Committee. It is recommended that the Policy Advisory
Committee authorize the Lead Agency to develop an amendment to the Interlocal
Agreement, to be approved and executed by each Partner governing body, to
provide Apex the same hydraulic capacity in the BCFM as currently proposed for the
Beaver Creek Pump Station and revise the cost share distributions accordingly.
Western Wake Partners
Report to the Policy
Advisory Committee (PAC07-17)
Date:
To: Policy Advisory Committee
From: Mike Bajorek, Interim Public Works and
Utilities Director, Town of
Prepared by: Leila R.
Goodwin, P.E., Water Resources Manager, Town of
Subject: Selection of Brown and Caldwell for
Engineering Services Related to Permitting Assistance
|
Background: |
NC
GS 143-64.31 sets forth a requirement for the announcement of all
architectural, engineering and surveying services for an amount greater than
$30,000 be solicited without regard to competitive pricing. Because N.C.G.S.
143-64.32 authorizes local governments to exempt particular projects from the
provisions of N.C.G.S. 143-64.31 at their sole discretion, stating the reasons
for the exemption, the Town of
The
Town is the lead agency for the Western Wake Partners (Apex, Cary,
The
Town of
The
Town proposes to enter into a contract with Brown and
A. Attend
Project Delivery Team (PDT) Meetings
Appropriate
staff from the consultant will attend the PDT meetings, which are typically
held from
B. Plan
and Attend Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meetings
Appropriate
staff from the consultant will attend the TAC meetings, which will likely be
held from
C. Additional
Meetings
Additional
meetings with the Partners or the Corps may be needed to review EIS or other
materials. Some meetings with the Corps
may be held in
D. Review
EIS Material
Consultant
will review any materials distributed by the Corps before the PDT meetings and
work with the Partners to develop comments on those materials if needed.
E. Perform
Engineering Analysis
In
some cases, the Partners may desire to investigate alternatives before
developing a submittal to the Corps. For
instance, one initial issue is the evaluation of whether to include selected
raw wastewater conveyance facilities, in addition to the Project, in the EIS
for permitting versus addressing them as cumulative impacts. In some cases, some engineering analysis may
be required in order to prepare comments on EIS materials. The consultant will prepare a brief
description and budget for such services on a case-by-case basis and will
obtain written (email) authorization from the Town of
F. Advise and Advocate
The
consultant will serve as a technical resource for the Partners. The consultant will advise the Partners
regarding schedule expectations.
The
contract will be on a cost-reimbursable basis and specific task requests of Brown
and Caldwell will be reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee. Costs are currently anticipated to be within
the Preliminary Work Permitting budget approved by the Policy Advisory
Committee in February 2007 (PAC07-08).
Requested Action: The Lead Agency
recommends that the Policy Advisory Committee authorize the Town of